TopIllust
Annual Report 2003    
  Highlights in 2002
   Advisory Council 2002   
       
The Advisory Council 2002 met on May 24, 2002 at NIAES to obtain outside opinions and recommendations on the management of NIAES.  The members of the council are external experts, including a professor, a consumer representative and the directors of other national institutions (see Appendix).
Members were informed on the general activities of NIAES in 2001 and were presented eight of the main research results in 2001.
 
The opinions expressed by the members were as follows:
 

1)

I had difficulty in evaluating the individual research achievements, because I couldn't judge how much effort had been needed in the achievement of individual goals.

2)

I could only evaluate the individual achievements either as A (good) or S (superior), because this evaluation list only had one year goals and only positive results.  I thought that this list should include the final goals to be achieved after several years and also negative results in order to provide us with more judgment material to assign S evaluations.

3)

I thought that the evaluation should be able to exceed 100% for research in which the results were good and far beyond expectations.

4)

I feared that if all subjects were evaluated by only single year results, the important and complex subjects could not be studied.  Please create the proper ways to evaluate the projects which need steady work to accumulate important background data.

5)

It was reported that the ratio was 7 vs. 1 between researchers who actively carried out research and the researchers in managerial position.  Wasn't it possible to increase the ratio of young researchers?

6)

I understand the limits for the budget in studying abroad, but how many of the applicant who wished to do so were able to do so?

7)

In other research institutes, in many cases the expensive machines purchased for common use were used by few persons.  It is necessary to promote the sharing of the expensive machines for the efficient use of the budget.  Was such co-use with outside researchers possible under the new NIAES as an incorporated administrative agency?

8)

Please publicize to the agricultural producers and the general public what kinds of research results have been achieved by the responsible national institutes with regards to the problems facing the nation now.

9)

I want to position the agricultural producers and the nation as the important clients of NIAES.

10)

Please monitor the frequency of access to and the influence of the utilization of the NIAES internet home page.

11)

I don't think "analysis and appraisal" or "classes and training" should be included among the measures for the evaluation of NIAES.  NIAES should be solely evaluated for those researches that are only possible at NIAES.  The current evaluation system has risks being misunderstood that any research could be undertaken for a certain fee.  NIAES deserves to be evaluated for more essential merits.

12)

I understood that there were goals set in 5-year mid term plan, and the evaluation system in carried out each fiscal year to measure progress.  But I thought that it is considerably difficult to achieve the ultimate goals in exactly 5 years.  It may not be so important whether to achieve the original goals, but rather the institute should take the initiative to vigorously encourage new research that incorporates emerging results, even if they shift from the original goals.

13)

I worried that the goals for the next mid-term might be similar to that of the present, especially for the research area that concerns the mission of the institute.  Such research areas should be distinguished from concrete and soluble issues, and it is necessary to devise research projects and goals that would reflect such considerations in four years later.

14)

Please remember that the basic researches which are carried out by NIAES about the effects of agriculture on the environment and the effects of the environment on agriculture are very important to the development of technologies that allow for the conservation of the environment as well as for the maintenance of food safety.


go to TOP go to TOP
Back To Contents back to Contents
Go To Niaes Home Page back to NIAES Home Page